Public starvation of a dog for "art...

topic posted Fri, April 18, 2008 - 11:09 AM by  I like unico...
I hate to be the bringer of such bad news........


I can't believe people allowed this to happen.

****

In 2007, the 'artist' Guillermo Vargas Habacuc, took a dog from
the street, tied him to a rope in an art gallery, and starved
him to death. Now he has been invited to murder again in 2008.

guillermohabacucvargas.blogspot.com/

Sign the petition
<www.petitiononline.com/ea6gk/...n.html> to block The
Bienal Centroamericana Honduras 2008 from supporting this artist:
This is a very serious matter...

For several days, the 'artist' and the visitors of the
exhibition have watched emotionless the shameful 'masterpiece'
based on the dog's agony, until eventually he died.
[image003]
<x07.xanga.com/398c50e5216...1342083.jpg>
[image002]
<x88.xanga.com/464c551b084...1342075.jpg>
[image004]
<x1e.xanga.com/b7cc5b1b684...1342094.jpg>
[image006]
<xfb.xanga.com/826c411b383...1342119.jpg>
[image005]
<xa5.xanga.com/f96c27e5212...1342106.jpg>
[image001]
<xa4.xanga.com/44ec55e0217...1342062.jpg>

Does it look like art to you?

But this is not all... the prestigious Visual Arts Biennial of
the Central American decided that the 'installation' was
actually art, so that Guillermo Vargas Habacuc has been invited
to repeat his cruel action for the biennial of 2008.

PLEASE HELP STOP HIM.

www.petitiononline.com/ea6gk/...on.html

It's free of charge, there is no need to register, your email is kept completely hidden and it will
only take 1 minute to help try and save the life of an innocent creature.

Thank you for your time.



  • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

    Fri, April 18, 2008 - 11:55 AM
    I signed it already.
    What disgusts me more than the fact that this "artist" (psychopath) though of this and did it.
    and more that this is considered "art" and what it means for real artists
    and more than that artistic organizations acclaimed the work.
    and even more than that the gallery (sociopaths) allowed it to happen

    is that people watched this and DID NOTHING...that not even ONE person who saw this thought of feeding the poor dog, giving him water even if they didn't have the balls to rescue him. No one even thought of helping him...This to me says a lot about the people of Honduras.

    that to me is MUCH worse than one individual would be psychopathic enough to do this, and that fucked up artists would support it, but what about all the patrons!!! they did nothing...they let the dog die!

    Based on this, I blame the people of Honduras MUCH more than I blame the artist.
    As of now, I am never going to Honduras or signing one more petition to help Honduras workers/peasants... ALL of Honduras is DEAD to me.
    • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

      Fri, April 18, 2008 - 7:32 PM
      why don't we tie him down and starve him to death? then everyone will know that poor people suffer.
      • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

        Fri, April 18, 2008 - 9:48 PM
        Not to be the devils advocate here..well I am anyway..

        I think we in our privileged "we keep pets as members of our families and they sleep bed with us"...forget that in the majority of the world people think about animals on a completely different level. Animals are either food or labor to help them make a living.

        I guarantee that the peasants and farmworkers were not at the gallery showing of this assholes art. They were working in the fields or sweatshops and have no more time to consider animal rights than they do to get their legs waxed or an Armani suit.
        • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

          Sat, April 19, 2008 - 2:09 AM
          You don't have to be educated or well off to know right from wrong. I know 3 year olds who know it is wrong to hurt animals.

          There is some talk on the internet that this may be a hoax to get this guy some publicity, just so y'all know. I am researching it, but so far it is inconclusive. Can anyone further our knowledge base on this?
          • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

            Sat, April 19, 2008 - 7:32 AM
            I see your point unicorn, and of course you're right, that it was the wealthy assholes of Honduras who were at that gallery probably...or at least the jaded middle class ... well at elast it wasn;t the peasants and sweat shop workers who visited the gallery.

            The reason why I said that I would not support Honduras causes and mentionned peasants and workers, is becasue those have been the issues regarding Honduras that have come up in the past in which people asked me to partcicipate.

            and while it may not be "fair" to the oppressed peasants and workers of Honduras for me to turn my back on them, I see it as a minimum amount of compassion is required for me to care about them... it's a personal choice.

            (don;t worry i still buy all my clothes fair-trade and do not purchase Honduras fruits, etc...so while I will not actively support their oppression, I am just choosing not to actively help them anymore either.

            I'm just saying that, Honduras is on its own as far as I'm concerned. I am not going to actively campaign for people to do the same, it is just my personal decision.

            ANd what you say about sensitivity to animal cruelty in rural areas is not true, while it is true that many peasants see animals as labour, etc...they do know right from worng as Anthonwy said...and in fact I would gather that even most animal raising farmers would know that to tie a dog up and starve him is wrong.

            In fact, from what I've read of people who have done humane society missions in India and the Middle East and elsewhere, most peasants are very receptive to animal welfare (perhaps not animal rights, but at least animal welfare)

            The reason why I think this is a reflection of the society as a whole is because of the type of gallery that it was, it was less an upscale gallery and more of a community gallery type deal...many MANY regular people saw this dog suffering and the fact that it didn't even enter the mind of even ONE of them to do something (at least offer the poor guy water) is damning.

            I understand that peasants who weren't there can not be blamed, but the fact that many many thousands of people saw this and NOT EVEN ONE OF THEM had compassion for this poor dog...that is bad...after all when they want to gauge how a society is they do surveys of 1000 people right? well to me this installation was a survey. and Honduras FAILED.

            There are MANY MANY poor places in the world where this would NOT have gone unnoticed, and people would have done something.

            And of course I am very much aware of the socio-political and economic situations leading up to the present conditions on Honduras, but the soul of a Nation usually shines through, and this instance to me shows the soul of Honduras, and it ain't pretty.
          • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

            Sat, April 19, 2008 - 10:35 AM
            I'm working on that too- I can't find any published articles in any journals- then again, I'm searching in english because of my own language barrier. If anyone can help with the language problem and find some published articles, or even the artists own website, it would be a great help.
            • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

              Sat, April 19, 2008 - 4:25 PM
              When we're addressing the borderline sociopaths that viewed this freak show and did nothing, I think we need to remember that when you enter a facility like an art gallery, your behavior changes. You are being put into the position as a "viewer", and someone else, (who within this dynamic, presumes to know more than you) shows you something that you might not understand.

              Its sick. Its wrong. But I bet there were plenty of people who thought of rescuing the dog.

              But here's the question: were people stopped? Did someone try? was the "exhibit" guarded?

              It's like that old psych experiment where people were instructed to shock the other person, and an astronomically high percentage of people shocked someone to "death".


              If the dude wants to starve himself? GREAT.... now THAT would be art. but this is just sick.... ick.
              • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                Sat, April 19, 2008 - 9:43 PM
                signed the petition even though snopes seems to say it's not really what it seems. i say where there's smoke there is usually fire, and this is a bit too much smoke for me. whether he let the dog starve or not, people THOUGHT he did, and may take away that it's ok, condoned by others, or whatever. we don't need to encourage bad behavior for any reason, certainly not art.

                the justificatin for the project seems weak at best...if it really was to prove how shallow people are by caring for the dog when it's in an art studio vs. not caring when it's on the street, that just strikes me as ludicrously unacceptable. a free dog can hunt prey and find plenty of food...one that is effectively in lockdown wouldn't stand a chance of finding his onw food.

                www.snopes.com/critters/c.../vargas.asp
                • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                  Sat, April 19, 2008 - 10:08 PM
                  I read the Snopes article. It's hard to believe. There ARE pictures of a dog. The dog looks terrible. The dog is tied up in a corner. There is a picture of people in a doorway looking at it. There is another picture of people in the background of the dog. So, even if Snopes says it's not what it seems there SEEMS to me to be some f*cked up sh*t happening. I absolutely do not believe that part that says that the dog was on display to look like he was starving but behind the scenes he was otherwise cared for. That is just horsesh*t.

                  Snopes didn't really get to the bottom of it. I guess the guy is from Costa Rica where they have laws against this sort of thing but because he did this in Honduras where there are no laws it's all fine and okay.

                  Ugh. Disgusting.

                  I live in Tucson. There is a HUGE problem with stray dogs. I can't imagine taking one off the streets and watching it die publicly is going to help save the dogs still running loose. Takes a twisted, deranged brain to come up with something like that.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                    Sat, April 19, 2008 - 11:40 PM
                    I spent some time visiting Peace Corps volunteers in Honduras in 1985, it immediately preceded my becoming vegetarian and things I experienced there were a major influence in tipping me over the edge into vegetarianism. Honduras is desperately poor, it's been the US' banana plantation and strategically located "ally" for a long time.

                    Animals, and particularly the numerous stray dogs there, are treated brutally. I intervened once when some kids were beating a painfully thin dog with sticks because it took a stale tortilla. They thought I was insane. The tortilla was for the chickens was the answer they gave when I asked why they were doing it.

                    The vast majority of people there are extremely poor and are brutalized themselves in myriad ways, basically so we can eat cheap bananas in the north. It's not a rationalization of the rampant animal abuse there but it puts it into context. For the campesinos I met, grinding poverty, rape, violence, murder, illness, injury and malnutrition were normal. I didn't eat bananas for many years after going there until I could find ones not grown there by the big fruit companies.

                    I wonder if this could it be a hoax to raise awareness of the issue?
                    • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                      Sun, April 20, 2008 - 7:17 AM
                      This "artist" reminds me of the psychoptah here in Toronto a while back who caught a stray cat and skinned her alive on video, in order to make a point to his teacher who had used the expression "there are many ways to skin a cat" afterwards just like trhis opportunist waste of human flesh in Honduras, he claimed that he had done it to "expose the hypocrisy" of a society that cares about pet animals and not about other animals (who are routinely skineed alive for fur and meat)

                      we must remember that psychopaths try to think, and they read the media , so when they make their "justifications" and claim their art is "proving a point" there's just saying those things so that they can keep doing the evil things that they want to do.

                      These people are monsters. And definitely NOT artists.

                      The horrible situation in Honduras is true, the guilt of North American culture and the CIA and the American Fruit Company is obvious. I personally have not bought bananas (unless organic fair trade) for the last ten years.
                      since I saw a documentary on PBS about what they did in the fifties in Honduras, how they staged a revolution and put a puppet in power (who became a horrible dictator) How they forced the Honduras government to plant only fruit crops to the point that the country had no subsistance crops left. (IT was a surreal documentary the ex-CIA guy that they were interviewign was describing what they did, and how cheaply they did it too, like a bad movie, so that they could show it on the newsreels before the movies, and make the people of the United States believe that there had been a capitalist revolution in Honduras and that the kindly CIA had been there to protect democracy...it was like the REAL wag the dog and it was SCARY to watch.

                      I guess all these replies HAVE made me realize that I'm kinda being a dick by saying that I;m blaming ALL of Honduras for this guy and his art...that's an irrational and reactionary behviour. I slept on it and realize that it's wrong to say that.

                      So I stand corrected ont hat point. That guy is an asshole and that gallery sucks, but Honduras and the poor people there still deserve compassion.

                      The situation in Honduras is horrible. But it could have been exposed with photography, painting, or any other form of legitimate artform. Above and beyond the animal cruelty issue, from an artistic standpoint, it takes no artistic skill at all, to pay children to capture a dog and then tie the dog up in a room...and not much intelligence either....and in fact only a psychopathic mind would actually see an interesting hypocrisy in this exposition (because psychopaths have usually simpler, childlike minds, since they never develop concisence they usually never develop higher reasoning, and that's why these obvious direct examples make sense to us, whereas for the rest of us, a simple juxtaposition of a picture of an emaciated streetdog, and a fat "pet' dog for example will do the trick)

                      a psychopath NEEDS the examplwe to be real, because otherwise his sick brain can't understand it.
                      We should all be educated to spot psychopathic behaviour or mentalities when we see it (so we can lock up those with those mindsets as soon as possible for their own good and the good of society)

                      we should DEFINITELY not applaud or even attempt to justify this mindset.
                      • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                        Sun, April 20, 2008 - 8:56 AM
                        Antoine said: "ANd what you say about sensitivity to animal cruelty in rural areas is not true, while it is true that many peasants see animals as labour, etc...they do know right from worng as Anthonwy said...and in fact I would gather that even most animal raising farmers would know that to tie a dog up and starve him is wrong."

                        For the record, I never said that poor people wouldn't know that starving a dog is wrong nor did I mention anything about them not being sensitive to animal cruelty. You seem to offer a lot of embellishment for the short paragraph I wrote.

                        I said simply that they don't have time/space in their lives to think about animal rights and that animals are not thought of in the same way that privileged people can afford to. This is of course a generalization and I'm sure (I really hope) there are many exceptions. Like others on this list, I've seen first hand in Mexico, Nicaragua and Thailand how dogs specifically often take the brunt of frustration of the poverty stricken and bystanders often don't take notice. No one in these places thought kicking dogs was wrong, or if they did they didn't say anything. It's also not proper in these places to interfere with someone beating their wife or kids.....
                        • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                          Sun, April 20, 2008 - 11:41 AM
                          When I was in Jamaica I saw a local kick a dog very hard on the beach. I said, "HEY! Don't do that!" He looked at me like I was crazy and said, "It's a DOG." in a very annoyed voice. Like I was stupid for seeing the dog as a life and breath and not "just" a dog.

                          How can we change the opinion of the rest of the world? I love animals, but don't carry them around in a tote on my shoulder. Is this what the rest of the world thinks we do with our pets?
        • Roy
          Roy
          offline 0

          Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

          Mon, April 21, 2008 - 9:05 AM
          What a weak excuse. My family came from poor villages and they knew it was wrong to mistreat animals. They would never make an excuse for it even though many of their fellow villagers did abuse animals. The attitude you have is typical of someone who has never lived that life. There is NEVER an excuse to torture animals - never. I don't care how poor you are. There are always other means. That is just a lazy attitude to give poor people a free ride to do so.
          • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

            Mon, April 21, 2008 - 10:01 AM
            I tend to agree with Roy.
            While it is true that I paraphrased you incorectly Unicorn, and i apologise for that, and thank you for clrifying your view, what I shoudl have said is that while some people in poor and desperate situations may take their frustrations out on other species, the same is true for those who aren't poor as well.

            And actually I remember reading a whole series of articles (i think it was on an animal friendly life, but I don't recall) about animal activist in poor and rural areas, and in what would be considered 5th world countries, and they found that often VERY disenfrancihsed poor people were actually MORE receptive to animal welfare than middle class people.
            • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

              Mon, April 21, 2008 - 11:52 AM
              rich people don't have a monopoly on morals.
              • kt
                kt
                offline 25

                Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                Tue, April 22, 2008 - 4:58 AM
                well said chopper. i signed it.
                • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                  Sun, April 27, 2008 - 8:04 PM
                  I just saw a follow up on Wayne Pacelle's page today. He's the Prez of the Humane Society. He's also vegan. I like his blog. It doesn't add too much to the already lengthly discussion but, here is what he said:

                  hsus.typepad.com/wayne/200...g-art.html

                  "During the last month, I've received a torrent of email about Costa Rican artist Guillermo Vargas featuring a starving street dog as “art” in a Nicaraguan gallery. According to accounts we've received, Vargas picked up the poor creature and displayed him in the gallery—attempting to make the point that such an animal on the street would go unnoticed, but in a gallery setting would be a spectacle. A local animal welfare group says the dog escaped after a day in the gallery.

                  Vargas's supposition about the shock value of his exhibit was prophetic. But even more so than he could have imagined, or bargained for. The image of the plaintive dog, presumably left to languish and suffer in the presence of gallery visitors and Vargas himself, was too much to fathom for many people who learned about it on the Internet. There was a spontaneous outburst of online petitions and condemnations of the supposed artist—a not uncommon phenomenon in the Internet age when shocking information goes viral.

                  Two observations. First, this circumstance underscores that there must be some limits in artistic expression, even if they are self-imposed by the artists themselves. Free expression is itself a moral imperative, but it is not absolute. It's one thing to document cruelty, but another matter to play a part in it, to exploit the suffering of other creatures, and to fail to provide any social context for it. Art and other cultural forms can be powerful media for promoting awareness of animal suffering and abuse, and for celebrating animals as creatures who deserve our admiration and respect, but this was not one of those cases. Obviously, if Vargas had taken photographs of starving street animals and called attention to the problem, then his art or documentary would not have provoked any calumny.

                  This controversy comes on the heels of a similar debate that erupted last month over an exhibit at the San Francisco Art Institute by the Paris artist Adel Abdessemed titled "Don't Trust Me." According to the San Francisco Chronicle, "the show included a series of video loops of animals being bludgeoned to death with a sledgehammer in front of a brick wall. The animals killed included a pig, goat, deer, ox, horse and sheep." An outcry ensued, and the Art Institute pulled the exhibit, and rightly so.

                  My other reaction is that we should rechannel our anguish and anger about Vargas and direct our energy to combat street dog problems in the developing world. Vargas is probably no more than a struggling artist, and we need not waste our time with further denunciations. But let's focus our energy on fighting the street dog problem and working to develop programs and infrastructure that can bring some relief to these creatures. This is a massive problem in the developing world, affecting hundreds of millions of animals, and our global affiliate Humane Society International has a Street Animal Welfare program to develop humane care, spay and neuter, and vaccination programs. Please do get involved with HSI. Get on our email list and get plugged in to our many international activities to help street dogs, to fight factory farming, and to stem the wildlife trade.

                  We cannot turn our gaze from this terrible problem throughout the world. And when we do focus on the problem, we must turn our anger into action, and select the right targets. Let's pivot from Vargas and focus on the ongoing cruelty, rather than seek retribution."


                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                    Mon, April 28, 2008 - 2:24 AM
                    Well said, very well said.

                    I am of the opinion that the animal "problem" which we have created will only ever be solved when we have no control over or influence on animals lives whatsoever. I envision a world where animals are free to live their lives without human influence. I realise it will take transitional steps to achieve this, but I am not sure what those transitionals are. Educating people about not "owning" or buying pets, or otherwise contributing to an animal industry, is what I am doing right now. Any other ideas?
                    • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                      Mon, April 28, 2008 - 8:11 AM
                      The only thing that I would say with regards to "pet" animals...of course the ownership issue goes without saying that people need to see animals as companions not pets...but due to the situation of dogs and cats and other mammals being bred and birds and fish and reptiles being captured to be sold in pet shops, there is an over abundance of "pet" animals in our industrialized world.

                      in my mind the first issue is to educate people against ever pruchasing "pet" animals. Tell them not to support pet shops or breeders.

                      in the meantime we need to work towards catch and release spay and neuter programs. And because the animals are there in shelters and we (collective we: humanity) created this problem we need to adopt as many animals as we can responsibly care for.

                      majke sure they are spayed or neutered so the population doesn't grow.

                      As for not having even companion animals at all, well of course that's the goal, but only once these animals are not being bred, captured and sold anymore.

                      Once we live in a world where no more animals are bred, captured and sold. There will be almost no animals in shelters. And then we can slowly wean the human race off of companion animals.

                      And work towards animals living free and wild. We live together with pigeons, racoons, foxes, mice and rats, we need to learn that eventually cats, dogs, birds, bunnies and etc... will all be wild animals, perhaps living near us (according to the environment) but not our "pets" or even our "companions" but that world is at least a few human generations away.

                      To tell people NOT to have companion animals at all in today's world, in my mind causes more harm than good. Because so many animals need a home and will be killed if one is not given to them. And of course we need to couple our promotion of adoption with a clear aboltionist messsage and promoting what I said above.

                      In my opinion though, the main thing to focus on is vegan outreach because if we consider ALL animal cruelty from labs to "pets", to fur and leather, to these gallery psychopaths, to all other forms of animal cruelty, those are only 1% of animals killed and tortured in the world. 99% are animals killed and tortured for food. So vegan outreach with a clear emphasis on cruelty and not causing harm to animals just for our food, is to me what we should spend ALL our efforts on.

                      Once we have a primarily vegan world (and we will get it in our life-time) all those other things will fall into place.
                    • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

                      Wed, May 14, 2008 - 12:52 AM
                      Oh, dude, if there was only a way. I am so with you on this. It is just so hard to get people (morons) to SEE. I am so out of words to even express what I am trying to say right now. It's just so frustrating and I feel so all alone on this issue most of the time. Just knowing there are more out there like me (you!) is encouraging. I guess we just have to have a bigger voice. . .?

                      ~Peace
                      Greta
  • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

    Fri, June 6, 2008 - 6:15 AM
    I heard and zaw zum articlez about thiz. In fact, my ztinkin myzpace profile haz a pic o him with a prayer fer the lil guy. That puppy iz ferever in ma heart. That artizt iz zuch a zcumbag, ta be honezt; I refuze ta find out anything bout him, cuz I'm concerned I'll be promted ta go find the s.o.b. There r few thingz in Life that have tuched like the fate of that lil dog. I think about him everyday. It wuz zo bad fer a lil while, feeling thiz kinda angzt and knivez in ma ztomach, I had ta zeriouzly queztion my stability. ahhahahha ! Itz tru. I don't get upzet or mad like that bout next ta nuthin. I'm a really eazy going kinda guy. And fairly stable in the mind, believe it r not. I don't think about hurting people or nuthin like that. I'm all about the Luv. I truely know that all people r good whether they zhow it or not. I've run with the werzt of the werzt, balieve me, and I ain't met a bad perzon yet. Wrong, but not bad. There'z juzt zumthin bout that poor dog, an the picturez and vidz of the poor lil guy juzt layin there with hiz hed down an hiz eyez clozed like that, that juzt burnz me up beyond be able ta be active againzt thiz ! I wizh I wuzn't zo damned moved by it that I can't even look at the fakt he'z gonna do it again ? ! ? ! I'd zurely ztop that zhit. Fer zum reazon what that guy did that lil dog, broke ma heart zo bad, I have ta ztay away from thiz whole thang. I wizh; I really do wizh, that I didn't feel zo overly passionate about thiz. I'm paralyzed from action, becuze IT WUDN'T HAPPEN AGAIN, I promise. I DO urge u to do wateva U CAN ta let people know wat/wen/where he'z planning to do that zhit again, and that the People get tagetha and ztop that madnezz. Like I said, I can't touch it or go there or have anythang ta do with that guy or wat. But PLEAZE, let everybody know and do wat u can IF he'z planning that zhit agin. I didn't think that wuz in America. I don't know, I won't look at thoze linkz or nuthin, it juzt pizzez me off too bad, er zumthing. People juzt gotta get tagetha and ztop that madnezz !
  • Re: Public starvation of a dog for "art...

    Thu, June 19, 2008 - 7:20 PM
    Heh I actually wrote my last final about this dog, Natividad.

    It would seem somewhere along the line that there was a poor translation of a Spanish newspaper, and someone thought that the dog had actually been starved to death. I spent several weeks researching everything I could find out about this dog, the artist and the gallery where it occurred, and to the best of my knowledge, the dog didn't actually die. The gallery owners claim that the dog was fed and watered during the exhibit and that the dog escaped sometime during the night. Some first versions of newspapers even claimed that Vargas had kept the dog as a pet.

    Most of the sources claiming that the dog was starved to DEATH are unreliable, like the blogspot linked above and the MySpace page it links to, especially since it claims he is 50 years old and Vargas was born in the 70's.

    Additionally, Vargas was NOT invited to perform "Eres Lo Que Lees", but a different piece altogether. He has also endorsed the petition and signed it.

    He's pointed out on several occasions that no one there cares about a dog that starves in the streets, but as soon as you put it in a gallery and make people look at it, everyone starts to care. However, no one tried to feed the dog,untie it, help it or call the police during the exhibit.

    I think it is sad that so many people signed that petition without really looking into it. If they had spent the time donating even $2 to a Costa Rican dog shelter they would have made a much larger difference.

    As for whether or not this guy is an artist, he certainly brought a lot of attention to the suffering of Costa Rican dogs and really stuck to his guns even when people were threatening to kill him and so forth. I think he's earned the title.

    Also, hi, I found this tribe through Anthonwy. ;)

Recent topics in "Go Vegan"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
favorite vegan places chopper-the ... 13 Today, 9:17 AM
Military is going to shoot pigs Xtine 3 July 20, 2008
george carlin offlinejoe 3 July 13, 2008
I need HELP--and fast!